Problem: the hexagonal refactor churns the backend tree for nine more phases; the UI delivery stack (web/ SPA, cmd/desktop Wails wrapper, compose/web image) must move to its own repo first so doc/layout rewrites land once on a backend-only tree. Change: - New repo git.hubris.network/dtoro/oikos-web (v0.33.0): web/, desktop/ (updateURL repointed to oikos-web releases), compose/, own CI (web + desktop jobs), own deploy script (CI-green gate, TOCTOU guard, version-tagged images, prune-to-3), own webhook receiver on :9798 + launchd unit, own compose project publishing the same 8091:80. - Cutover executed on mac-mini in order: oikos stack's web service stopped+removed, oikos-web project brought up on 8091; outer Caddy untouched (targets the published port) — serving + Authentik flow + /wails 404 quirk verified post-cutover. - Stripped from oikos: web/, cmd/desktop/, compose/web/, desktop CI workflow, ci.yml web job, Makefile ui/desktop/desktop-package/install targets, the compose web service, oikos-web from deploy.sh's fallback prune list; wails + go-keyring dropped from go.mod, vendor synced. - README / CONTRIBUTING / AGENTS.md / .agents dev+operations docs now point at the new repo; mbse + mascot design docs carry a path note. Risk: production SPA serving depends on the new pipeline now; rollback is versioned-image re-up of the old web service from a pre-split checkout (port 8091). Desktop builds installed before the split still check dtoro/oikos releases — one manual reinstall, noted in the oikos-web release notes. Verification: go vet, make test (race), make generate-check, golangci (no new findings; baseline down 400→365); post-cutover curls — localhost:8091 200, /wails/runtime.js 404, outer Caddy 302 Authentik.
42 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
42 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
<!-- BEGIN MICROSOFT SECURITY.MD V0.0.7 BLOCK -->
|
|
|
|
## Security
|
|
|
|
Microsoft takes the security of our software products and services seriously, which includes all source code repositories managed through our GitHub organizations, which include [Microsoft](https://github.com/Microsoft), [Azure](https://github.com/Azure), [DotNet](https://github.com/dotnet), [AspNet](https://github.com/aspnet), [Xamarin](https://github.com/xamarin), and [our GitHub organizations](https://opensource.microsoft.com/).
|
|
|
|
If you believe you have found a security vulnerability in any Microsoft-owned repository that meets [Microsoft's definition of a security vulnerability](https://aka.ms/opensource/security/definition), please report it to us as described below.
|
|
|
|
## Reporting Security Issues
|
|
|
|
**Please do not report security vulnerabilities through public GitHub issues.**
|
|
|
|
Instead, please report them to the Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC) at [https://msrc.microsoft.com/create-report](https://aka.ms/opensource/security/create-report).
|
|
|
|
If you prefer to submit without logging in, send email to [secure@microsoft.com](mailto:secure@microsoft.com). If possible, encrypt your message with our PGP key; please download it from the [Microsoft Security Response Center PGP Key page](https://aka.ms/opensource/security/pgpkey).
|
|
|
|
You should receive a response within 24 hours. If for some reason you do not, please follow up via email to ensure we received your original message. Additional information can be found at [microsoft.com/msrc](https://aka.ms/opensource/security/msrc).
|
|
|
|
Please include the requested information listed below (as much as you can provide) to help us better understand the nature and scope of the possible issue:
|
|
|
|
* Type of issue (e.g. buffer overflow, SQL injection, cross-site scripting, etc.)
|
|
* Full paths of source file(s) related to the manifestation of the issue
|
|
* The location of the affected source code (tag/branch/commit or direct URL)
|
|
* Any special configuration required to reproduce the issue
|
|
* Step-by-step instructions to reproduce the issue
|
|
* Proof-of-concept or exploit code (if possible)
|
|
* Impact of the issue, including how an attacker might exploit the issue
|
|
|
|
This information will help us triage your report more quickly.
|
|
|
|
If you are reporting for a bug bounty, more complete reports can contribute to a higher bounty award. Please visit our [Microsoft Bug Bounty Program](https://aka.ms/opensource/security/bounty) page for more details about our active programs.
|
|
|
|
## Preferred Languages
|
|
|
|
We prefer all communications to be in English.
|
|
|
|
## Policy
|
|
|
|
Microsoft follows the principle of [Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure](https://aka.ms/opensource/security/cvd).
|
|
|
|
<!-- END MICROSOFT SECURITY.MD BLOCK -->
|