Files
oikos/web/node_modules/tough-cookie/README.md
dtoro d4d99a7473
Some checks failed
ci / build-test (push) Has been cancelled
ci / docker-build (push) Has been cancelled
feat: Phase 1 — extract the client (web SPA + desktop) to dtoro/oikos-web
Problem: the hexagonal refactor churns the backend tree for nine more
phases; the UI delivery stack (web/ SPA, cmd/desktop Wails wrapper,
compose/web image) must move to its own repo first so doc/layout
rewrites land once on a backend-only tree.

Change:
- New repo git.hubris.network/dtoro/oikos-web (v0.33.0): web/, desktop/
  (updateURL repointed to oikos-web releases), compose/, own CI (web +
  desktop jobs), own deploy script (CI-green gate, TOCTOU guard,
  version-tagged images, prune-to-3), own webhook receiver on :9798 +
  launchd unit, own compose project publishing the same 8091:80.
- Cutover executed on mac-mini in order: oikos stack's web service
  stopped+removed, oikos-web project brought up on 8091; outer Caddy
  untouched (targets the published port) — serving + Authentik flow +
  /wails 404 quirk verified post-cutover.
- Stripped from oikos: web/, cmd/desktop/, compose/web/, desktop CI
  workflow, ci.yml web job, Makefile ui/desktop/desktop-package/install
  targets, the compose web service, oikos-web from deploy.sh's fallback
  prune list; wails + go-keyring dropped from go.mod, vendor synced.
- README / CONTRIBUTING / AGENTS.md / .agents dev+operations docs now
  point at the new repo; mbse + mascot design docs carry a path note.

Risk: production SPA serving depends on the new pipeline now; rollback
is versioned-image re-up of the old web service from a pre-split
checkout (port 8091). Desktop builds installed before the split still
check dtoro/oikos releases — one manual reinstall, noted in the
oikos-web release notes.

Verification: go vet, make test (race), make generate-check, golangci
(no new findings; baseline down 400→365); post-cutover curls —
localhost:8091 200, /wails/runtime.js 404, outer Caddy 302 Authentik.
2026-08-15 22:27:52 +02:00

6.0 KiB

Tough Cookie · RFC6265 RFC6265bis npm version CI on Github Actions: salesforce/tough-cookie PRs Welcome

A Node.js implementation of RFC6265 for cookie parsing, storage, and retrieval.

Getting Started

Install Tough Cookie using npm:

npm install tough-cookie

or yarn:

yarn add tough-cookie

Usage

import { Cookie, CookieJar } from 'tough-cookie'

// parse a `Cookie` request header
const reqCookies = 'ID=298zf09hf012fh2; csrf=u32t4o3tb3gg43; _gat=1'
  .split(';')
  .map(Cookie.parse)
// generate a `Cookie` request header
const cookieHeader = reqCookies.map((cookie) => cookie.cookieString()).join(';')

// parse a Set-Cookie response header
const resCookie = Cookie.parse(
  'foo=bar; Domain=example.com; Path=/; Expires=Tue, 21 Oct 2025 00:00:00 GMT',
)
// generate a Set-Cookie response header
const setCookieHeader = cookie.toString()

// store and retrieve cookies
const cookieJar = new CookieJar() // uses the in-memory store by default
await cookieJar.setCookie(resCookie, 'https://example.com/')
const matchingCookies = await cookieJar.getCookies('https://example.com/')

Important

For more detailed usage information, refer to the API docs.

RFC6265bis

Support for RFC6265bis is being developed. As these revisions to RFC6252 are still in Active Internet-Draft state, the areas of support that follow are subject to change.

SameSite Cookies

This change makes it possible for servers, and supporting clients, to mitigate certain types of CSRF attacks by disallowing SameSite cookies from being sent cross-origin.

Example

import { CookieJar } from 'tough-cookie'

const cookieJar = new CookieJar() // uses the in-memory store by default

// storing cookies with various SameSite attributes
await cookieJar.setCookie(
  'strict=authorized; SameSite=strict',
  'http://example.com/index.html',
)
await cookieJar.setCookie(
  'lax=okay; SameSite=lax',
  'http://example.com/index.html',
)
await cookieJar.setCookie('normal=whatever', 'http://example.com/index.html')

// retrieving cookies using a SameSite context
const laxCookies = await cookieJar.getCookies('http://example.com/index.html', {
  // the first cookie (strict=authorized) will not be returned if the context is 'lax'
  // but the other two cookies will be returned
  sameSiteContext: 'lax',
})

Note

It is highly recommended that you read RFC6265bis - Section 8.8 for more details on SameSite cookies, security considerations, and defense in depth.

Cookie prefixes are a way to indicate that a given cookie was set with a set of attributes simply by inspecting the first few characters of the cookie's name.

Two prefixes are defined:

  • "__Secure-"

    If a cookie's name begins with a case-sensitive match for the string __Secure-, then the cookie was set with a "Secure" attribute.

  • "__Host-"

    If a cookie's name begins with a case-sensitive match for the string __Host-, then the cookie was set with a "Secure" attribute, a "Path" attribute with a value of "/", and no "Domain" attribute.

If prefixSecurity is enabled for CookieJar, then cookies that match the prefixes defined above but do not obey the attribute restrictions are not added.

You can define this functionality by passing in the prefixSecurity option to CookieJar. It can be one of 3 values:

  1. silent: (default) Enable cookie prefix checking but silently fail to add the cookie if conditions are not met.
  2. strict: Enable cookie prefix checking and error out if conditions are not met.
  3. unsafe-disabled: Disable cookie prefix checking.

If ignoreError is passed in as true when setting a cookie then the error is silent regardless of the prefixSecurity option (assuming it's enabled).

Example

import { CookieJar, MemoryCookieStore } from 'tough-cookie'

const cookieJar = new CookieJar(new MemoryCookieStore(), {
  prefixSecurity: 'silent',
})

// this cookie will be silently ignored since the url is insecure (http)
await cookieJar.setCookie(
  '__Secure-SID=12345; Domain=example.com; Secure;',
  'http://example.com',
)

// this cookie will be stored since the url is secure (https)
await cookieJar.setCookie(
  '__Secure-SID=12345; Domain=example.com; Secure;',
  'https://example.com',
)

Note

It is highly recommended that you read RFC6265bis - Section 4.1.3 for more details on Cookie Prefixes.

Node.js Version Support

We follow the Node.js release schedule and support all versions that are in Active LTS or Maintenance. We will always do a major release when dropping support for older versions of node, and we will do so in consultation with our community.