Problem: the hexagonal-architecture plan (plans/2026-08-15-hexagonal-
architecture.md) needs its foundation — an accepted ADR, the target
directory tree, and machine-checked dependency rules — before any
service extraction starts. Also folds the four outstanding review
findings (F3.1/F5/F6/F7) into the plan: ObservationService owns the
bounded probe-concurrency contract (scheduler.go:133), Phase 9 gates
ExecutionService+PolicyService ≥ 90% with a gating-matrix test,
per-phase abort criteria, and the §3.2 internal/config note.
Change:
- docs/adr/0016-hexagonal-ports-adapters.md records context, decision,
and consequences of the ports & adapters migration.
- internal/domain → internal/core/domain (mechanical import rewrite,
20 files), new internal/core/{ports,app}, internal/adapters trees
with package docs.
- .golangci.yml: depguard rules for §3.1 (core purity, no agent-client
tech in core, nomos isolation — the nomos rules self-activate when
internal/nomos exists in Phase 8). Config migrated to golangci-lint
v2 format so it loads at all (the v1 config errored under v2, masked
by CI's advisory continue-on-error). Verified depguard fires on a
planted openai-go import in internal/core/app.
- CONTRIBUTING.md layout section now shows the core/adapters tree.
Risk: import path churn is mechanical and tests pass unchanged; the
lint config migration surfaces the pre-existing 400-issue baseline
(advisory in CI, unchanged policy) — new/moved packages lint clean.
Verification: go vet ./..., make test (race, core/domain at 100%
coverage), make generate-check, golangci-lint on internal/core/... and
internal/adapters/... — 0 issues; depguard violation probe confirmed.
4.0 KiB
ADR 0016 — Hexagonal (ports & adapters) architecture for the oikos backend
Status: accepted (2026-08-15) · Plan: plans/2026-08-15-hexagonal-architecture.md
Context
The oikos backend grew as delivery-layer packages with business logic inside
them. internal/httpapi (~3500 LOC) and internal/mcp (~2100 LOC, 67 tools)
each embed raw SQL next to validation, policy, and audit writes — two parallel
silos re-implementing the same use-cases. The scheduler is a ~1100-LOC
monolith mixing probe dispatch, health aggregation, signal transitions, and
metric writes. There is one accidental port/adapter pair
(secrets.Backend) and one inverted dependency (internal/db imports
checkdefaults). Use-cases have no home: every new consumer (REST handler,
MCP tool, scheduler pass) copy-pastes query + policy + audit logic, and
behavior drifts between paths that must agree — the run/approve/execute
lifecycle exists in three variants.
A staff-level review of the refactor plan settled the open questions: one
hexagon (not per-binary), nomos stays an external agent client over the wire,
aggregate-scoped repository methods instead of a UnitOfWork port, reads bypass
services via a shared ReadModels port, and the client (web SPA + desktop)
moves to its own repository before the backend churn starts.
Decision
Adopt ports & adapters across the backend, delivered in ten shippable phases:
internal/core/domain(pure model, stdlib only),internal/core/app(application services = use-cases),internal/core/ports(driven-port interfaces). Core imports nothing from adapters; adapters andcmd/*import core.- All I/O behind named ports implemented by adapters under
internal/adapters/: postgres (repositories), ssh (CommandExecutor), probes/* (one Checker per check kind), remote (TargetResolver), secrets, events (EventPublisher/SSE), plus the driving adapters httpapi, mcpserver, scheduler, execworker, cli. - One repository method = one transaction = one aggregate's atomic boundary
(
§3.6of the plan). Inputs carry audit/event entries and derived checks; nopgx.Txcrosses into core; no UnitOfWork port. - Commands flow through
core/appservices; invariant-free reads flow adapter →ReadModels→ presenter with no service hop (CQRS-lite). - REST and MCP keep their existing wire formats and become thin driving adapters over the same services; presenters stay per-adapter.
- nomos never links core: it consumes oikos exclusively through MCP/REST.
Its Phase 8 cleanup defines nomos-local ports (
LLMClient,HomelabClient,SessionStore) outsidecore/ports. - The Gitea
webhookreceiver and the desktop shell are leaf utilities — documented, not restructured. - Dependency rules are enforced with
depguardfrom Phase 0 (rule 3, theinternal/nomosbans, activates when that package exists in Phase 8).
Consequences
- No API, MCP-tool, DB-schema, or wire-format changes ride along; behavior parity is guarded by the existing handler contract tests plus a repository conformance suite asserting atomicity and check-then-act per command method.
internal/dbshrinks to connection/migrations/sqlcgen inside the postgres adapter; thedb → checkdefaultsinversion disappears withSeedService.- Each phase merges green (
make lint test generate-check,make test-dbwhere repositories change) with a patch version bump; per-phase abort criteria revert a merge that breaks transaction semantics. Minor bump at Phase 9 completion. - Cost accepted: ~10 phases of import churn, sqlc path updates under
make generate-check, and a temporary period where old and new package locations coexist (depguard denies core→adapter imports from Phase 0 so the new tree can never grow the old inversions). - Risk trade-off recorded in the plan: a repository method whose tx span is too narrow is a bug class this design makes possible; the conformance suite is the mitigation, and the check-then-act sites enumerated in the plan (approval decide, entity transition, check derivation, execution claim) are its first assertions.