package main

import (
	"bytes"
	"context"
	"encoding/json"
	"fmt"
	"net/http"
	"regexp"
	"strings"
)

// Chat-assent approval: the operator authorizes a proposed action by
// replying normally in chat ("go ahead", "yes", "do it") instead of clicking
// a separate Approve button. This is deterministic (not LLM-judged) so it
// can't be talked around by a model that misreads intent, and it only ever
// looks at the assistant turn immediately preceding the operator's reply —
// an old "yes" from three messages ago can never retroactively approve
// something new. Destructive-risk actions are excluded: they always need the
// explicit typed-confirmation flow, never loose assent.

// pendingApproval is one gated action proposed in the immediately-preceding
// assistant turn, extracted from its tool_result text.
type pendingApproval struct {
	execID      string
	destructive bool
}

// executionQueuedRE matches the "execution <uuid> queued" phrasing shared by
// the run and request_execution/pct_create tool result messages.
var executionQueuedRE = regexp.MustCompile(`(?i)execution\s+([0-9a-f]{8}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{12})\s+queued`)

// extractPendingApprovals scans the tool results of one assistant turn for
// gated actions that are still awaiting a decision.
func extractPendingApprovals(calls []persistedCall) []pendingApproval {
	var out []pendingApproval
	for _, c := range calls {
		text := c.resultText()
		m := executionQueuedRE.FindStringSubmatch(text)
		if m == nil {
			continue
		}
		out = append(out, pendingApproval{
			execID:      m[1],
			destructive: strings.Contains(strings.ToUpper(text), "DESTRUCTIVE"),
		})
	}
	return out
}

// negationWords, checked first: any of these anywhere in the message means
// the reply is NOT assent, even if a positive word also appears (e.g. "no,
// don't restart it yet" contains neither "yes" nor "go ahead", but "wait"
// alone should also block a stray "yes" a sentence later — checking negation
// first and returning false errs toward re-confirming rather than assuming
// consent, per "when in doubt, escalate"). Includes contracted negatives
// ("haven't", "isn't", ...) alongside "don't"/"do not" — found live: "I
// haven't confirmed anything yet" was reading as an explicit confirmation
// because none of the contracted forms were covered, only "don't"/"do not".
// Deliberately does NOT include a bare "not": that's broad enough to false-
// negative ordinary assent ("go ahead, this is not risky") — the specific
// contracted-verb forms below are unambiguous negation on their own.
var negationWords = []string{
	"no", "nope", "don't", "do not", "stop", "wait", "hold on", "hold off",
	"not yet", "cancel", "nevermind", "never mind", "actually don't", "skip that",
	"haven't", "hasn't", "isn't", "wasn't", "aren't", "can't", "cannot",
	"won't", "wouldn't", "shouldn't", "didn't", "doesn't",
}

// assentWords, checked only if no negation matched.
var assentWords = []string{
	"go ahead", "goahead", "yes", "yep", "yeah", "yup", "do it", "proceed",
	"approve", "approved", "confirm", "confirmed", "ship it", "sounds good",
	"lgtm", "run it", "execute", "ok go", "okay go", "please do",
}

// wordTokenRe splits a message into lowercase word tokens. Apostrophes
// (straight ' and curly ’) stay attached to their word so "don't"/"haven't"
// tokenize as one token, not two.
var wordTokenRe = regexp.MustCompile(`[a-z0-9'’]+`)

func tokenize(msg string) []string {
	return wordTokenRe.FindAllString(strings.ToLower(strings.ReplaceAll(msg, "’", "'")), -1)
}

// containsPhrase reports whether phrase (one or more words) appears as a
// consecutive run of WHOLE tokens in tokens — never a mid-word substring
// match. This is the fix for a real false positive found live: the old
// substring check (`strings.Contains(m, "yes")`) matched "yes" inside
// "yesterday", and "confirm" inside "confirmed"/"unconfirmed" without regard
// for word boundaries. Negation already used a word-boundary check
// (space-padded); assent/confirm words didn't — this brings both onto the
// same, more robust tokenized comparison instead of ad-hoc string padding.
func containsPhrase(tokens []string, phrase string) bool {
	words := strings.Fields(phrase)
	if len(words) == 0 || len(words) > len(tokens) {
		return false
	}
	for i := 0; i+len(words) <= len(tokens); i++ {
		match := true
		for j, w := range words {
			if tokens[i+j] != w {
				match = false
				break
			}
		}
		if match {
			return true
		}
	}
	return false
}

// isAssent reports whether msg is a plain-language authorization of a
// pending proposal. Deliberately simple and auditable: a fixed word list,
// not a model judgment call, so behavior is predictable and can't be
// prompt-injected via the pending action's own content.
func isAssent(msg string) bool {
	tokens := tokenize(msg)
	for _, w := range negationWords {
		if containsPhrase(tokens, w) {
			return false
		}
	}
	for _, w := range assentWords {
		if containsPhrase(tokens, w) {
			return true
		}
	}
	return false
}

// isTypedConfirmation reports whether msg is an explicit confirmation strong
// enough to grant a DESTRUCTIVE pending action. Deliberately a separate,
// stricter check from isAssent: a bare "yes"/"go ahead"/"proceed" must never
// grant something destructive, only an explicit "confirm" statement does —
// this is the typed-confirmation phrase SOUL.md tells the operator to use
// ("I confirm destroy 135"). Still negation-aware for the same reason as
// isAssent: "don't confirm yet" must not accidentally match.
func isTypedConfirmation(msg string) bool {
	tokens := tokenize(msg)
	for _, w := range negationWords {
		if containsPhrase(tokens, w) {
			return false
		}
	}
	return containsPhrase(tokens, "confirm") || containsPhrase(tokens, "confirmed")
}

// approveExecution grants (or denies) a pending execution via the same HTTP
// endpoint the chat UI's Approve button calls, so both paths share one code
// path server-side (executeApprovedAction) and one audit trail. Returns the
// decided status, or an error if the request failed outright (a 4xx for an
// already-decided/expired approval is reported via ok=false, not a hard err,
// since that's an expected race, not a bug).
func (a *agent) approveExecution(ctx context.Context, execID string) (ok bool, status string, err error) {
	if a.apiBase == "" {
		return false, "", fmt.Errorf("no API base configured")
	}
	body, _ := json.Marshal(map[string]string{"decision": "approve"})
	req, err := http.NewRequestWithContext(ctx, http.MethodPost,
		a.apiBase+"/api/v1/approvals/"+execID+"/decision", bytes.NewReader(body))
	if err != nil {
		return false, "", err
	}
	req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
	if a.apiToken != "" {
		req.Header.Set("Authorization", "Bearer "+a.apiToken)
	}
	resp, err := a.httpClient.Do(req)
	if err != nil {
		return false, "", err
	}
	defer resp.Body.Close()
	if resp.StatusCode != http.StatusOK {
		return false, "", nil // already decided / expired / not found — not a hard failure
	}
	var out struct {
		Status string `json:"status"`
	}
	json.NewDecoder(resp.Body).Decode(&out)
	return true, out.Status, nil
}