docs: close out task-completion safety net plan; fix stale relative links

Fixes 1-3 deployed and verified live: fresh trivial Q&A sessions now reach
done immediately, and a goal-bearing session that stalled was correctly
nudged by the idle sweep. Fix 4 (backfill) was replaced with deletion after
the operator's call — verified against the DB first that zero knowledge
notes were linked to or written by any of the 53 removed sessions, so
nothing was lost. Documents the pagination gap in listSessions (hardcoded
LIMIT 50, no total count) that hid 6 of those sessions from the original
audit.

Also fixes relative links in this plan and in the UI-review plan that broke
when both moved from plans/ to plans/done/ (one directory level deeper).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-07-12 00:14:15 +02:00
parent 075ff93792
commit c8b479d565
3 changed files with 84 additions and 36 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
# Task completion safety net: every live task is stuck "Running"
Status: Done — 2026-07-12. Fixes 1-3 implemented, built, tested
(`go build ./...`, `go test ./cmd/nomos/...`), committed (`3b9c75f`),
deployed, and verified live (see Verification below — fresh trivial Q&A
sessions now reach `done` immediately; a goal-bearing session that went
idle was correctly nudged and auto-resolved by the existing resume-failure
path). Fix 4 (backfill) was replaced with deletion — see "Fix 4, revised"
below; the original backfill-with-a-fabricated-outcome approach was never
run.
## Scope
Fix the root cause of a production-wide defect found while UI-testing
[`2026-07-11-ui-review-ia-usability.md`](2026-07-11-ui-review-ia-usability.md):
every session on the live task board shows as "Running" forever. Traced
through `cmd/nomos/` and confirmed against the running database — this is
not a frontend bug (the board correctly reflects real `agent_sessions.status`
values). It's an agent-behavior gap: the model almost never calls the
lifecycle tools (`set_goal` / `propose_plan` / `complete_task`) that the
task-board feature (shipped today,
[`done/2026-07-11-goal-oriented-chat-control-panel.md`](2026-07-11-goal-oriented-chat-control-panel.md))
depends on to know a task is finished.
## Evidence
Queried the live nomos API directly (`curl localhost:8092/sessions` and
per-session transcripts) against the running mac-mini stack:
- **50/50 live sessions**: 49 `active`, 1 `planning`. Zero have ever reached
`executing`, `awaiting_input`, `done`, or `failed`.
- Across all 50 sessions: **`set_goal` called once. `propose_plan` called
zero times. `complete_task` called zero times.**
- The dominant pattern (43/50 sessions, 2-message transcripts) is a single
quick exchange: operator asks something narrow ("what's the hostname of
lxc:caddy?"), the model runs one read tool (`run hostname`), answers in
plain text, and the turn ends — no lifecycle tool call at all. This is
exactly the case
[`nomos/SOUL.md:105-109`](../../nomos/SOUL.md#L105) calls out by name
("a trivial read-only task... is a degenerate case... answer it and
`complete_task` with a one-line summary") — the instruction exists and is
explicit, and the model skips it anyway, consistently.
- The one session that *did* call `set_goal` (a fleet health check) did
substantial real research (`get_health_summary`, `get_state_snapshot`,
`get_signal_history`, `list_lxcs`), gave the operator a full structured
answer, and then also just stopped — no `propose_plan`, no
`complete_task`. Status: stuck at `planning` since 2026-07-11T11:35, still
showing "Running" on the board.
This means the board's "N Running / 0 Done / 0 Failed" isn't a fluke or an
edge case — it's the default outcome for essentially every task the system
has ever run. The feature as designed (terminal state is 100% dependent on
the model remembering to call one specific tool) doesn't hold up against
real model behavior, even with an explicit prompt instruction already in
place.
## Where this lives in the code
`cmd/nomos/agent.go`'s `chatWith` has exactly one place a turn ends with a
plain-text answer and no tool calls:
```go
// agent.go:359-368
if len(msg.ToolCalls) == 0 {
emit(agentEvent{Type: "text", Data: msg.Content, SessionID: sessionID})
emit(agentEvent{Type: "done", ...})
return
}
```
This is reached for the trivial-Q&A case (a turn that made zero or a few
read-only tool calls this iteration, then answered in text) and is where
43/50 of the stuck sessions are produced. There's a second, rarer exit at
the step-limit fallback (`agent.go:487-494`, `finalSummary`) with the same
gap.
Neither exit currently checks whether the session ever reached a terminal
state — the turn just ends, and `agent_sessions.status` is left wherever it
was (usually `active`, its creation-time default,
[`store.go:71,84`](../../cmd/nomos/store.go#L71)).
## Design
Two different failure shapes need two different fixes — collapsing them
into one heuristic would either auto-close genuinely in-progress structured
tasks or fail to catch the trivial-Q&A majority.
**1. Trivial/no-lifecycle-tool sessions (the 43/50 case) — auto-complete
inline, same turn.**
If a turn ends with a plain-text response (`len(msg.ToolCalls) == 0`, the
existing exit at `agent.go:359`) AND this session has never called
`set_goal` in its history, that's strong evidence this was never meant to
be a structured multi-step task — it's a one-shot question that got
answered. Call `store.completeTask` server-side right there, before the
`return`, with `outcome="success"` and a summary derived from the response
text (first ~120 chars, same truncation pattern
`buildContinuationNote` already uses at
[`continue.go:203-205`](../../cmd/nomos/continue.go#L203)). No LLM call needed
— this is a mechanical default, not a judgment call, matching the "trivial
task" case SOUL.md already describes.
If the session *has* called `set_goal` (meaning the model explicitly framed
this as a task, e.g. the fleet-health-check session), auto-completing on
the very next plain-text turn is riskier — the model may reasonably expect
to be asked something next. Skip the inline auto-complete for these; case 2
covers them.
**2. Structured (goal/plan set) sessions that stall — idle sweep, not
inline.**
Extend the existing `runContinuationWorker` ticker
([`continue.go:41-57`](../../cmd/nomos/continue.go#L41), already polling every
4s for a different purpose) with a second, coarser sweep — e.g. every 5
minutes — that finds sessions where:
- `status` is `active`, `planning`, or `executing` (not already terminal or
`awaiting_input`, which has its own resolution path), AND
- `set_goal` was called (this is a real task, not case 1), AND
- `last_active_at` is older than some idle threshold (start with 15
minutes — long enough that it's not still mid-turn, short enough that the
board doesn't lie for hours).
First idle hit: inject a system note next time nothing else touches the
session ("[System: this task has been idle for N minutes with no
`complete_task` call. If the goal is done, call it now with a summary. If
you're genuinely still working, ignore this.]") the same way
`buildContinuationNote` already injects notes into resumed sessions — reuse
`resumeSession`'s live-persist pattern
([`continue.go:106-196`](../../cmd/nomos/continue.go#L106)) so the nudge and
the model's response show up in the transcript, not silently.
If a second idle sweep finds the same session still not completed (i.e.
the nudge didn't take), auto-complete it directly with
`outcome="partial"` and a summary noting it was auto-closed after an
unanswered nudge — same reasoning as `resumeSession`'s existing
"give the task a real, operator-visible terminal state instead of leaving
it silently stuck forever" logic at
[`continue.go:179-193`](../../cmd/nomos/continue.go#L179), which already does
exactly this for a different failure mode (a resume that produces no
response). This is the same architectural pattern, applied to a session
that produces responses but never a terminal tool call.
**3. Leave `ask_operator` and gated-execution flows alone.** Those already
have real terminal signals (`awaiting_input` status, the continuation
worker's assent-window logic) — this plan only targets sessions that fall
through with no lifecycle signal at all.
## Fix plan
1. **Inline safety net (case 1)** — in `chatWith`'s plain-text exit
(`agent.go:359`), check `set_goal` was never called for this session
(cheap: track a bool while replaying `history` in the same function, no
extra query — the loop at `agent.go:209-226` already walks every
persisted message and could flag `sawSetGoal` while extracting tool
calls). If not sawSetGoal, call `completeTask` before returning.
2. **Idle sweep (case 2)** — new ticker in `continue.go` (or extend the
existing one with a slower secondary tick), a new store query
(`store.staleGoalSessions(ctx, idleThreshold)` mirroring
`pendingContinuations`'s shape), and reuse of `resumeSession`'s
live-persist injection for the nudge.
3. **Second-strike auto-close (case 2, continued)** — track nudge count (a
new `agent_sessions` column, e.g. `completion_nudges int default 0`, or
reuse the existing `summary`/attributes json instead of a schema change
if that's preferable) so the sweep can tell "never nudged" from "nudged
once already, still stuck."
4. **Backfill** — the 50 already-stuck live sessions won't get fixed by new
code alone (they're historical). One-time cleanup: run the same
case-1/case-2 classification against existing rows once the code ships,
so the board doesn't show 50 permanently-orphaned "Running" cards on top
of new correctly-terminating ones. This should be a script, not a manual
UPDATE — the classification logic will already exist in Go.
## Fix 4, revised: deletion instead of backfill
The plan as written proposed backfilling the 50 already-stuck sessions with
a mechanically-assigned outcome (`success` for case 1, `partial` for case
2). When it came time to execute that, the operator raised a better
question: these were overwhelmingly one-off test/smoke-test sessions
("hi", "what's the hostname of lxc:caddy?") with no lasting value —
assigning them a fabricated `success` outcome would make the task board
lie in the opposite direction (claiming verified success on things nobody
verified). The operator's call: delete them instead of backfilling a
guessed outcome, with one condition — don't lose any recorded knowledge.
Before deleting anything, verified directly against the database (not
assumed from reading the code):
- Zero `documents` relationship edges exist linking any of the candidate
sessions to any `knowledge_entities` row.
- Zero `upsert_knowledge` calls appear anywhere in the candidate sessions'
transcripts.
- Zero `knowledge_entities` rows exist system-wide mentioning the one
topic (`typetype`) the operator specifically asked to preserve.
`deleteSession` (`store.go:293`, already the live code path behind the
UI's "Delete task" button — reused as-is, not reimplemented) removes the
session, its messages, its own task entity, and that entity's relationship
edges — it never touches `knowledge_entities` rows or entities the task
merely referenced (e.g. `lxc:typetype` itself), only the provenance edges
back to the now-deleted task. Given the verification above, this was safe:
there was nothing to preserve because nothing had ever been recorded.
Executed in two batches, both via the same `DELETE /sessions/:id` route:
- **47 sessions** — the original candidate set from `curl
localhost:8092/sessions`, all non-`done`/`failed` at the time.
- **6 more sessions** — found *after* the first batch, when they surfaced
on the task board: `listSessions` (`store.go:193`) hardcodes
`ORDER BY last_active_at DESC LIMIT 50` with no pagination, so the
original audit's "50 sessions total" was actually "the 50 most
recently active" — it silently excluded 6 older stuck sessions from
2026-07-08 (predating the task-board feature entirely, same trivial
"hi"/smoke-test pattern). Worth knowing about `listSessions`'s cap for
any future audit of this table — a `count(*)` query directly against
the database is the only way to get a true total.
Final state: `agent_sessions` holds exactly 3 rows — the two `done` and
one `failed` sessions produced during live verification of fixes 1-3.
## Implementation order
1. Fix 1 (inline safety net) first — it's the highest-leverage, lowest-risk
change (self-contained, no schema change, covers 43/50 of the evidence).
2. Fix 2+3 (idle sweep + second-strike) — needs the schema decision
(new column vs. attribute) settled first; smaller blast radius than 1
but touches the ticker/worker machinery, deserves its own review pass.
3. Fix 4 (backfill) last, once 1-3 are deployed and verified live — running
it before the code ships would just recreate the same gap for new
sessions created in between.
## Verification
- After fix 1: start a few trivial one-shot chats against the live agent
(`hostname`-style questions), confirm each session reaches `status=done`
immediately after the answer, via `curl localhost:8092/sessions/:id` or
the task board.
- After fix 2+3: manually let a goal-bearing session go idle past the
threshold (or lower the threshold for a local test run), confirm the
nudge appears in the transcript, then confirm second-strike auto-close
fires if the nudge is ignored.
- Re-run the same audit query used to find this bug
(`curl localhost:8092/sessions` → status histogram) a day after deploy;
the "stuck active/planning forever" count should track only genuinely
in-flight tasks, not accumulate.
## Open questions
- **Outcome for case-1 auto-complete**: always `"success"`, or worth a
cheap heuristic (e.g. scan the final text for obvious failure language)?
Recommend starting with always-`"success"` — SOUL.md's own trivial-task
guidance doesn't distinguish, and a wrong "success" on a genuinely-failed
one-shot lookup is low-stakes (the transcript still shows the real
answer; nothing acts on the outcome besides the board's color).
- **Idle threshold (15 min) and nudge-to-close gap**: arbitrary starting
points, not measured against real task durations — worth revisiting after
a week of the new sessions' real timing data exists.
- **Schema change for nudge tracking**: a new column is simpler to query
than packing state into existing JSON, but adds a migration — worth
confirming that's acceptable before starting fix 2+3 (this plan defers
that call to whoever implements it, per Implementation order above).