Files
Socrates/apps/web/lib/llm/prompts/socrates/analyze-model.md
dtoro b55425cc68 Pivot to text-first column-stack workspace + merge-with-review across AI artifacts
Workspace
- Pivot from "set of open panes" to a Finder-style miller column stack:
  TopBar / LeftSidebar / [section → entity → entity ...] / pinned text editor.
  openPanesStore is now an ordered Column[] with pushFrom / closeFrom /
  setStack; only one top-level section is rooted at a time.
- New entity column panes: Term, Block, Association, Constraint,
  Requirement, Finding. Click-through navigation truncates deeper
  columns automatically.
- LeftSidebar surfaces a pending-count chip per section (single-glance
  navigation cue) and spins its analyze ↻ via SVG Spinner whenever the
  LLM is working — including server-initiated runs caught by the runs
  poll, not just user-triggered ones.

Analyze pipeline + persistence
- Unified `concepts` pass (taxonomy + glossary in one LLM call) replaces
  the two-pass setup. Server still accepts ?section=taxonomy|glossary
  and normalizes them for back-compat.
- model / requirements / detection (assumptions, risks, inconsistencies)
  + cross-layer validation rules (X1–X4: stale term link, unlinked
  formalism, undefined linked term, prose-only term).
- Persistence: NarrativeDocument, ModelSnapshot, ChangelogEntry,
  TaxonomyTerm, RequirementEntry, Finding, AnalysisRun. Re-runs MERGE
  instead of replace: gentle update on existing items, suggested on new,
  deprecated on missing — same idiom for every artifact kind. User pins
  preserve "kept" decisions across re-analyses.
- Migrations: pivot_text_first, add_requirement_linked_term,
  term_review_state, review_state_for_reqs_and_findings,
  add_term_definition_pinned.

Concept ↔ ontology integration
- linkedTermId on Block / Association / Constraint / Requirement.
  PromoteToolbar lets the user formalize a concept inline: + Block /
  + Association / + Constraint / + Requirement, all routed through
  applyOps so undo/redo and SSE work for free.
- decideElement op for in-canvas keep/discard on review-pending model
  elements.

User-authored definitions
- TermColumn definition is click-to-edit. Save (Cmd-Enter / blur),
  Cancel (Esc), Reset to AI suggestion when pinned.
- definitionPinned flag on TaxonomyTerm: future Analyze runs leave the
  user's text alone. setTermDefinition repo function + POST
  /api/projects/[id]/terms/[termId]/definition endpoint.
- mergeTaxonomySuggestion + applyGlossaryDefinitions both pin-aware.

UX/UI
- StatusChip: single component for all state idioms (suggested,
  deprecated, accepted, dismissed, resolved, severity, validation code,
  confidence, warn). Replaces 5+ ad-hoc badge classes.
- PaneControls (PaneViewTabs + PaneFilterChip): separates view-mode
  toggles from filter chips so toggling Pending no longer flips you off
  the current view.
- PaneEmpty: unified empty-state with title + hint + action.
- PaneDrawer: collapsible groups for Pending / Discarded review; cards
  group as Kept (top) → Pending (bottom drawer) → Discarded (Findings
  only, hidden when empty). Restore action recovers dismissed/resolved
  findings.
- ConceptCard unifies Tree and A–Z views in Concepts; only Tree parents
  carry the chevron (no empty placeholder offset).
- Type + spacing tokens (--text-xs..xl, --space-1..6, --lh-tight/ui/
  prose, --radius-*) replace every ad-hoc value.
- Buttons standardized to body sans 500 (was a mishmash of mono / display).
- Card shells unified across Concepts / Requirements / Findings.

Cleanup
- Removed: LeftRail, FindingsPanel, IssuesPanel, SocratesDock,
  ProposalCard, SlashMenu, SlashExtension, slashSuggestion,
  CanvasHeader, TaxonomyPane, GlossaryPane, TermDetail (popover; now
  TermColumn).
- Section ids in openPanesStore: dropped taxonomy/glossary, added
  concepts. localStorage migration runs on hydrate.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-01 00:12:06 +02:00

2.5 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

You are deriving a SysML model from a product-thinking document and a known taxonomy of terms. The output backs a visual ontology canvas the user will edit.

Inputs

  • The prose document.
  • The taxonomy term list — each label is a candidate block.

What to produce

A lean SysML model with blocks (and optionally associations, constraints, requirements). Prefer a small, accurate model over a large, speculative one.

Blocks

  • Use the taxonomy as the primary source of block candidates. Most blocks should correspond to a taxonomy term.
  • kind: "system" for the overall thing being designed, "actor" for human/external roles, "block" for everything else.
  • Reuse the term's exact label as the block label.
  • Set linkedTermLabel to the matching term so we can mark it as linked in the sidebar. Use the same spelling as the term list.
  • A block is allowed without a taxonomy term only when the document clearly implies it but no term was extracted (rare).

Associations

  • Only include associations the document actually describes. No speculation.
  • Verb phrase labels: "guides", "contains", "reports_to".
  • Optional linkedTermLabel: when the relationship itself is named in the taxonomy as a concept (e.g. there's a term "Mentorship" and the association is "Tutor mentors Student"), set it. Most associations don't have one.

Constraints

  • Optional linkedTermLabel: when the constraint is a concept on its own (e.g. the term "Daily Cap" and the constraint is sessions_per_day <= 3), set it.

Requirements

  • Optional linkedTermLabel: when the requirement is fundamentally about a single taxonomy term (e.g. REQ-001 is about Personalization), set it. This is distinct from satisfiedBy (which links to blocks the requirement formalizes against).

Confidence

Score confidence ∈ [0, 1] honestly. Things straight from the prose: 0.8+. Reasonable inferences: 0.50.7. Speculation: leave it out.

Output

{
  "systemOfInterestId": "tutor",
  "blocks": [
    {
      "id": "tutor",
      "label": "Tutor",
      "kind": "system",
      "linkedTermLabel": "Tutor",
      "confidence": 0.95,
      "properties": [
        { "name": "personality", "type": { "kind": "enum", "values": ["socratic", "encouraging"] } }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "associations": [
    { "id": "a1", "fromBlockId": "tutor", "toBlockId": "student", "label": "guides", "kind": "association", "confidence": 0.9 }
  ],
  "constraints": [],
  "requirements": [],
  "overallConfidence": 0.8
}

Return ONLY the JSON object. No prose. No code fences.