Pivot to text-first column-stack workspace + merge-with-review across AI artifacts
Workspace - Pivot from "set of open panes" to a Finder-style miller column stack: TopBar / LeftSidebar / [section → entity → entity ...] / pinned text editor. openPanesStore is now an ordered Column[] with pushFrom / closeFrom / setStack; only one top-level section is rooted at a time. - New entity column panes: Term, Block, Association, Constraint, Requirement, Finding. Click-through navigation truncates deeper columns automatically. - LeftSidebar surfaces a pending-count chip per section (single-glance navigation cue) and spins its analyze ↻ via SVG Spinner whenever the LLM is working — including server-initiated runs caught by the runs poll, not just user-triggered ones. Analyze pipeline + persistence - Unified `concepts` pass (taxonomy + glossary in one LLM call) replaces the two-pass setup. Server still accepts ?section=taxonomy|glossary and normalizes them for back-compat. - model / requirements / detection (assumptions, risks, inconsistencies) + cross-layer validation rules (X1–X4: stale term link, unlinked formalism, undefined linked term, prose-only term). - Persistence: NarrativeDocument, ModelSnapshot, ChangelogEntry, TaxonomyTerm, RequirementEntry, Finding, AnalysisRun. Re-runs MERGE instead of replace: gentle update on existing items, suggested on new, deprecated on missing — same idiom for every artifact kind. User pins preserve "kept" decisions across re-analyses. - Migrations: pivot_text_first, add_requirement_linked_term, term_review_state, review_state_for_reqs_and_findings, add_term_definition_pinned. Concept ↔ ontology integration - linkedTermId on Block / Association / Constraint / Requirement. PromoteToolbar lets the user formalize a concept inline: + Block / + Association / + Constraint / + Requirement, all routed through applyOps so undo/redo and SSE work for free. - decideElement op for in-canvas keep/discard on review-pending model elements. User-authored definitions - TermColumn definition is click-to-edit. Save (Cmd-Enter / blur), Cancel (Esc), Reset to AI suggestion when pinned. - definitionPinned flag on TaxonomyTerm: future Analyze runs leave the user's text alone. setTermDefinition repo function + POST /api/projects/[id]/terms/[termId]/definition endpoint. - mergeTaxonomySuggestion + applyGlossaryDefinitions both pin-aware. UX/UI - StatusChip: single component for all state idioms (suggested, deprecated, accepted, dismissed, resolved, severity, validation code, confidence, warn). Replaces 5+ ad-hoc badge classes. - PaneControls (PaneViewTabs + PaneFilterChip): separates view-mode toggles from filter chips so toggling Pending no longer flips you off the current view. - PaneEmpty: unified empty-state with title + hint + action. - PaneDrawer: collapsible groups for Pending / Discarded review; cards group as Kept (top) → Pending (bottom drawer) → Discarded (Findings only, hidden when empty). Restore action recovers dismissed/resolved findings. - ConceptCard unifies Tree and A–Z views in Concepts; only Tree parents carry the chevron (no empty placeholder offset). - Type + spacing tokens (--text-xs..xl, --space-1..6, --lh-tight/ui/ prose, --radius-*) replace every ad-hoc value. - Buttons standardized to body sans 500 (was a mishmash of mono / display). - Card shells unified across Concepts / Requirements / Findings. Cleanup - Removed: LeftRail, FindingsPanel, IssuesPanel, SocratesDock, ProposalCard, SlashMenu, SlashExtension, slashSuggestion, CanvasHeader, TaxonomyPane, GlossaryPane, TermDetail (popover; now TermColumn). - Section ids in openPanesStore: dropped taxonomy/glossary, added concepts. localStorage migration runs on hydrate. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
53
apps/web/lib/llm/prompts/socrates/interview.md
Normal file
53
apps/web/lib/llm/prompts/socrates/interview.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
|
||||
# Mode: Seed interview (live, per-turn)
|
||||
|
||||
You are conducting an opening interview with a product manager who is starting a new idea inside Socrata. Goal: produce a `SeedDraft` (problem, target user, desired outcome, optional initial hypothesis, optional constraints) that's specific enough to generate a coherent SysML model from.
|
||||
|
||||
You are stateful across turns — each call gives you the running thread + the draft you've extracted so far. Improve the draft, ask the next question, and signal when there's enough to proceed.
|
||||
|
||||
## Behaviour
|
||||
|
||||
- **Maximum 5 user turns total** before you mark the interview ready. Don't drag it out.
|
||||
- Each turn: ask exactly ONE question. Don't pile.
|
||||
- Question 1: the problem in one sentence — the smallest, most honest version.
|
||||
- Question 2: target user, with a specificity probe ("which users, why now").
|
||||
- Question 3: desired outcome — what changes when this exists.
|
||||
- Question 4: a tension probe — name a likely tension you see and ask which side they're on.
|
||||
- Question 5: explicit constraints — anything regulatory, ethical, technical that's non-negotiable.
|
||||
|
||||
## Updating the draft
|
||||
|
||||
- Each turn, update the draft fields based on what you've learned. Use the user's own register where possible.
|
||||
- Leave a field empty (`""`) until the user has actually addressed it. Don't fabricate.
|
||||
- `confidence` (0..1) is your honest read on whether the draft is specific enough to generate a useful model. Generic platitudes → low. Specific, falsifiable → high.
|
||||
|
||||
## Ready signal
|
||||
|
||||
Set `ready: true` when:
|
||||
- All five core fields (problem, targetUser, desiredOutcome) are populated AND specific, OR
|
||||
- 5 user turns have elapsed AND the draft has at least problem + targetUser + desiredOutcome.
|
||||
|
||||
When `ready: true`, your `text` should be a brief synthesis ("Here's what I understand…") plus an explicit "Ready to generate the initial model — say go or refine.", not another question.
|
||||
|
||||
## Voice
|
||||
|
||||
Per character.md. Question-led, economical, no filler. Press for specificity if an answer is vague — "what specifically does X mean here?" beats "tell me more".
|
||||
|
||||
## Output schema (strict)
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"text": "string (1–3 sentences)",
|
||||
"draft": {
|
||||
"title": "string (a working name for the project)",
|
||||
"problem": "string",
|
||||
"targetUser": "string",
|
||||
"desiredOutcome": "string",
|
||||
"initialHypothesis": "string (optional)",
|
||||
"constraints": ["string"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"confidence": 0.0,
|
||||
"ready": false
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Return ONLY the JSON object. No prose preamble, no code fences.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user