Pivot to text-first column-stack workspace + merge-with-review across AI artifacts
Workspace - Pivot from "set of open panes" to a Finder-style miller column stack: TopBar / LeftSidebar / [section → entity → entity ...] / pinned text editor. openPanesStore is now an ordered Column[] with pushFrom / closeFrom / setStack; only one top-level section is rooted at a time. - New entity column panes: Term, Block, Association, Constraint, Requirement, Finding. Click-through navigation truncates deeper columns automatically. - LeftSidebar surfaces a pending-count chip per section (single-glance navigation cue) and spins its analyze ↻ via SVG Spinner whenever the LLM is working — including server-initiated runs caught by the runs poll, not just user-triggered ones. Analyze pipeline + persistence - Unified `concepts` pass (taxonomy + glossary in one LLM call) replaces the two-pass setup. Server still accepts ?section=taxonomy|glossary and normalizes them for back-compat. - model / requirements / detection (assumptions, risks, inconsistencies) + cross-layer validation rules (X1–X4: stale term link, unlinked formalism, undefined linked term, prose-only term). - Persistence: NarrativeDocument, ModelSnapshot, ChangelogEntry, TaxonomyTerm, RequirementEntry, Finding, AnalysisRun. Re-runs MERGE instead of replace: gentle update on existing items, suggested on new, deprecated on missing — same idiom for every artifact kind. User pins preserve "kept" decisions across re-analyses. - Migrations: pivot_text_first, add_requirement_linked_term, term_review_state, review_state_for_reqs_and_findings, add_term_definition_pinned. Concept ↔ ontology integration - linkedTermId on Block / Association / Constraint / Requirement. PromoteToolbar lets the user formalize a concept inline: + Block / + Association / + Constraint / + Requirement, all routed through applyOps so undo/redo and SSE work for free. - decideElement op for in-canvas keep/discard on review-pending model elements. User-authored definitions - TermColumn definition is click-to-edit. Save (Cmd-Enter / blur), Cancel (Esc), Reset to AI suggestion when pinned. - definitionPinned flag on TaxonomyTerm: future Analyze runs leave the user's text alone. setTermDefinition repo function + POST /api/projects/[id]/terms/[termId]/definition endpoint. - mergeTaxonomySuggestion + applyGlossaryDefinitions both pin-aware. UX/UI - StatusChip: single component for all state idioms (suggested, deprecated, accepted, dismissed, resolved, severity, validation code, confidence, warn). Replaces 5+ ad-hoc badge classes. - PaneControls (PaneViewTabs + PaneFilterChip): separates view-mode toggles from filter chips so toggling Pending no longer flips you off the current view. - PaneEmpty: unified empty-state with title + hint + action. - PaneDrawer: collapsible groups for Pending / Discarded review; cards group as Kept (top) → Pending (bottom drawer) → Discarded (Findings only, hidden when empty). Restore action recovers dismissed/resolved findings. - ConceptCard unifies Tree and A–Z views in Concepts; only Tree parents carry the chevron (no empty placeholder offset). - Type + spacing tokens (--text-xs..xl, --space-1..6, --lh-tight/ui/ prose, --radius-*) replace every ad-hoc value. - Buttons standardized to body sans 500 (was a mishmash of mono / display). - Card shells unified across Concepts / Requirements / Findings. Cleanup - Removed: LeftRail, FindingsPanel, IssuesPanel, SocratesDock, ProposalCard, SlashMenu, SlashExtension, slashSuggestion, CanvasHeader, TaxonomyPane, GlossaryPane, TermDetail (popover; now TermColumn). - Section ids in openPanesStore: dropped taxonomy/glossary, added concepts. localStorage migration runs on hydrate. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
70
apps/web/lib/llm/prompts/socrates/analyze-model.md
Normal file
70
apps/web/lib/llm/prompts/socrates/analyze-model.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
|
||||
You are deriving a **SysML model** from a product-thinking document and a known taxonomy of terms. The output backs a visual ontology canvas the user will edit.
|
||||
|
||||
## Inputs
|
||||
|
||||
- The prose document.
|
||||
- The taxonomy term list — each label is a candidate block.
|
||||
|
||||
## What to produce
|
||||
|
||||
A lean SysML model with **blocks** (and optionally associations, constraints, requirements). Prefer a small, accurate model over a large, speculative one.
|
||||
|
||||
### Blocks
|
||||
|
||||
- Use the taxonomy as the *primary* source of block candidates. Most blocks should correspond to a taxonomy term.
|
||||
- `kind`: `"system"` for the overall thing being designed, `"actor"` for human/external roles, `"block"` for everything else.
|
||||
- Reuse the term's exact `label` as the block label.
|
||||
- Set `linkedTermLabel` to the matching term so we can mark it as linked in the sidebar. Use the same spelling as the term list.
|
||||
- A block is allowed without a taxonomy term only when the document clearly implies it but no term was extracted (rare).
|
||||
|
||||
### Associations
|
||||
|
||||
- Only include associations the document actually describes. No speculation.
|
||||
- Verb phrase labels: `"guides"`, `"contains"`, `"reports_to"`.
|
||||
- Optional `linkedTermLabel`: when the relationship itself is named in the
|
||||
taxonomy as a concept (e.g. there's a term "Mentorship" and the association
|
||||
is "Tutor mentors Student"), set it. Most associations don't have one.
|
||||
|
||||
### Constraints
|
||||
|
||||
- Optional `linkedTermLabel`: when the constraint is a concept on its own (e.g.
|
||||
the term "Daily Cap" and the constraint is `sessions_per_day <= 3`), set it.
|
||||
|
||||
### Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- Optional `linkedTermLabel`: when the requirement is fundamentally *about* a
|
||||
single taxonomy term (e.g. REQ-001 is about Personalization), set it. This
|
||||
is distinct from `satisfiedBy` (which links to blocks the requirement
|
||||
formalizes against).
|
||||
|
||||
### Confidence
|
||||
|
||||
Score `confidence` ∈ [0, 1] honestly. Things straight from the prose: 0.8+. Reasonable inferences: 0.5–0.7. Speculation: leave it out.
|
||||
|
||||
## Output
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"systemOfInterestId": "tutor",
|
||||
"blocks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "tutor",
|
||||
"label": "Tutor",
|
||||
"kind": "system",
|
||||
"linkedTermLabel": "Tutor",
|
||||
"confidence": 0.95,
|
||||
"properties": [
|
||||
{ "name": "personality", "type": { "kind": "enum", "values": ["socratic", "encouraging"] } }
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"associations": [
|
||||
{ "id": "a1", "fromBlockId": "tutor", "toBlockId": "student", "label": "guides", "kind": "association", "confidence": 0.9 }
|
||||
],
|
||||
"constraints": [],
|
||||
"requirements": [],
|
||||
"overallConfidence": 0.8
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Return ONLY the JSON object. No prose. No code fences.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user